“Right to Emergency Care” - A flooding rumour

The following e-mail is visiting a lot of inboxes these days:

Right to Emergency Care:
Date Of Judgment: 23/02/2007.
Case No.: Appeal (civil) 919 of 2007.

The Supreme Court has ruled that all injured persons especially in the
case of road traffic accidents, assaults, etc., when brought to a
hospital / medical centre, have to be offered first aid, stabilized and
shifted to a higher centre / government centre if required. It is only
after this that the hospital can demand payment or complete police
formalities. In case you are a bystander and wish to help someone in an
accident, please go ahead and do so. Your responsibility ends as soon
as you leave the person at the hospital.

The hospital bears the responsibility of informing the police, first
aid, etc.

Please do inform your family and friends about these basic rights so
that we all know what to expect and what to do in the hour of need.
Please not only go ahead and forward, use it too!!!!

The message tells us that this is the Supreme Court judgement to Appeal(Civil) 919 of 2007. On searching the Judgement Information System it was clear that the case was in no manner related to the said message.

It was about a no-profit charitable hospital based in Ghanapur, Andhra Pradesh having claimed exemptions on imported medical equipments, based on Para 2 of Notification No. 64/88-Cus, which were granted. But since according to the classification of hospitals by the notification, it fell under Para 3, it also applied for exemption under the same, after the first exemption was granted.

On rejection of the second application, they filed the case in the AP High Court, which again didn’t go in their favour and hence this case was filed in Supreme Court.

For more details, on the case, check out the Judgement Information System.

Always verify any such crucial information related to the lives of people before you believe in it.

5 Responses to ““Right to Emergency Care” - A flooding rumour”

  1. Jai Hind: Proud to be an Indian Says:

    “Right to Emergency Care” - A flooding rumour…

    The following e-mail is visiting a lot of inboxes these days:
    Right to Emergency Care:
    Date Of Judgment: 23/02/2007.
    Case No.: Appeal (civil) 919 of 2007.
    The Supreme Court has ruled that all injured persons especially in the
    case of road traffic accid…

  2. Lalu John Philip Says:

    visit my blog to read more about this topic:

    http://lalujohnphilip.blogspot.com

  3. Poonam Says:

    Hey, you have explained this case in terms of legal notification..so a person like me who really has no clue about legal paras, I am not sure what to conclude..if this is true or rumor..so I will perhaps need to research more..and search through the judgment reference system..

    And you are right we should research this before blogging, that is what I was doing when I landed up on your website..seems a pretty neat blog..keep blogging.. :)

  4. Sailesh Kalantri Says:

    Thanks to this site, while I was looking for sec no. of this judgement I cam across this site and this answered clearly.

  5. Rejimon CK Says:

    actual case is this one. citation No. Criminal Writ Petn. No. 270 of 1988 dated by Ranganath Misra dated 28 Aug 1989
    http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.aspx?filename=7839 (original order Copy here)
    Must see chandigarh police implimentation…
    http://www.chandigarhtrafficpolice.org/helpingvictims.php

Leave a Reply